Insatiably curious blogger Potpie Girl
stumbled upon an indexed copy of Google’s training manual for human URL
quality raters in October. The 120+ page guide was more a reinforcement
of search engine optimization best practices than an earth shattering
revelation of the inner workings of the organic algorithm.
The actual influence of these human
raters is debatable; many believe they are used in troubleshooting and
improving the algorithm, rather than having a direct impact on
rankings.Matt Cutts, Google Distinguished Engineer and head of the web
spam team, tackled the subject in a Google Webmaster Help video blog
yesterday.
Raters Are Really Not Used to Influence Google’s Rankings Directly
Human raters work under the Search Quality Evaluation Team and are used in the initial testing phases of proposed changes to the organic search algorithm.
“There are hundreds of raters who are
paid to give a URL say, ‘Is this good stuff Is this bad stuff? How
useful is it. Cutts explained. Once those URL ratings are assigned,
engineers can test proposed algorithmic changes within Google’s internal
corporate network and have the new results evaluated.That evaluation of
new results should show whether the results tend to be better,
according to Cutts.
“Raters Might Miss Some Spam or Might Not Notice Some Things
One of my previous posts discussed
whether it was possible to try to optimize your site for Google’s human
raters. At that time, a person claiming to be a Google rater had said in
a forum that they processed between 30 to 60 of these evaluations an
hour. They really weren’t going into any depth and were looking for more
glaring issues.There are hundreds of them working to evaluate URLs,
giving Google insight into trends in proposed changes and the new
results they produce.
If a proposed change makes it past these
initial test phases, it is put to a side-by-side test, where two sets of
results are pitted against one another and evaluated for relevance and
improved user experience.
You Just Might Be a Human Rater
After all of this internal testing,
Google serves up the new results to a small percentage of users and use a
variety of indicators to gauge user satisfaction. Human raters are no
substitute for the intuition and the experience search engine engineers
have, explained Cutts, pointing out that a change that rid results of
spam may not resonate as the best site for the user.
“We do take the evaluation and the
results of human raters as well as the analysts who evaluate those
results very seriously.We want to make sure that we’re launching a
change that is overall a big improvement ideally, at least an
improvement for users.
Those Ratings Don’t Directly Affect the Search Engine Results
Cutts tries to lay the rumor to rest that
Google’s human quality raters have a direct influence on search engine
rankings. Rather, they are a part of the massive testing process leading
to some 500 or so tweaks to Google’s search algorithm annually.If you
can get your hands on a copy of the Google Human Search Quality Raters
Guide, it’s still worth a read, if only to reinforce best practices in
white hat SEO.
Perseverance Technology is a
global IT services and consulting company with a strong focus on new
technology and enterprise solutions. We are also providing you the
facility to hire virtual software developer and hire Virtual developer at a very rational cost.
No comments:
Post a Comment